Loading slide
In 2012, a team from the University of Toronto submitted an entry unlike anything else in the competition.
Their result: 15.3% error. Nearly half the previous year's best.
The judges thought there had been a mistake. No system had ever improved that much in a single year. The gap between first and second place was larger than the entire improvement the field had made in the two years before.
The network was named AlexNet.
There was no mistake.