Loading slide

ImageNet and the Turning Point

  1. 01ImageNet and the Turning Point
  2. 02Fei-Fei Li and ImageNet
  3. 03The traditional approach
  4. 04AlexNet
  5. 05What it felt like
  6. 06What made it work
  7. 07How it taught itself
  8. 08Take a breath
  9. 09What did it actually learn?
  10. 10The field responds
  11. 11Why this was a hinge
  12. 12Memory card
  13. 13Reinforce your understanding
  14. 14Question: Data vs. algorithm
  15. 15Question: Hand-engineered vs. learned features
  16. 16Question: What does a turning point feel like from inside?
  17. 17Quiz: answer
  18. 18What you now know
  19. 19The machine could now see. The next question was whether it could read.
  20. 20Want to go deeper?
4 / 19
BackNext

AlexNet

In 2012, a team from the University of Toronto submitted an entry unlike anything else in the competition.

, , and Geoffrey Hinton had built a deep neural network, eight layers deep with 60 million , and trained it on two consumer graphics cards, the same kind of GPUs from the last chapter. They hadn't hand-engineered any features. They hadn't told the network what to look for. They had simply shown it the training images, let it adjust its weights, and let it work out what mattered on its own.

Their result: 15.3% error. Nearly half the previous year's best.

The judges thought there had been a mistake. No system had ever improved that much in a single year. The gap between first and second place was larger than the entire improvement the field had made in the two years before.

The network was named AlexNet.

There was no mistake.

Citations(2)↓
  1. 1. papers.nips.cc
  2. 2. arxiv.org