The question is still open

In 1950, Alan Turing predicted that by the year 2000, a machine might be able to fool an average interrogator about 30 percent of the time after five minutes of conversation.

That prediction did not settle the matter. When machines later became good enough to fool some judges, people did not simply conclude that machines think; they argued about the test instead, or moved the standard somewhere else.

Turing also anticipated that reaction. In his paper, he discussed the “argument from disability”: the claim that a machine can never do certain things humans can, such as use language properly, learn from experience, or do something really new.

So the question he raised in 1950 is still open. It may always remain so.